People v. Underwood

2024 NY Slip Op 04836
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 3, 2024
DocketInd No. 75339/22 Appeal No. 2705 Case No. 2023-06285
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 04836 (People v. Underwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Underwood, 2024 NY Slip Op 04836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Underwood (2024 NY Slip Op 04836)
People v Underwood
2024 NY Slip Op 04836
Decided on October 03, 2024
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 03, 2024
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, González, Pitt-Burke, JJ.

Ind No. 75339/22 Appeal No. 2705 Case No. 2023-06285

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Taj Underwood, Defendant-Appellant.


Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Anna Notchick of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brendan Lantry, J., at plea; Ann D. Thompson, J., at sentencing), rendered October 31, 2023, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of two years, unanimously modified, as a matter 0f discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the surcharge and fees imposed at sentencing, and otherwise affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545 [2019], cert denied 589 US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094, 1096 [2016]), which forecloses review of his excessive sentence claim. In any event, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Based on our own interest of justice powers, we vacate the mandatory surcharge and fees imposed on defendant at sentencing (see People v Chirinos, 190 AD3d 434 [1st Dept 2021]). We note that the People do not oppose this relief.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 3, 2024



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bryant
68 N.E.3d 60 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 04836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-underwood-nyappdiv-2024.