People v. Ulster C. P

New York Supreme Court

People v. Ulster C. P

7 Wend. 492

DecidedFebruary 9, 1832

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Wend. 492 (People v. Ulster C. P) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ulster C. P, 7 Wend. 492 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The common pleas did right in refusing to quash the appeal. Notice of appeal left with a member of the family of the justice of suitable age, in his absence, is sufficient. This case is within the principle of the decision in 7 Cowen, 487; the only distinguishable feature is, that there the wife of the justice was expressly authorized by her husband to receive the notice, Whether such authority be given or not, is not material. The motion for a mandamus is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The common pleas did right in refusing to quash the appeal. Notice of appeal left with a member of the family of the justice of suitable age, in his absence, is sufficient. This case is within the principle of the decision in 7 Cowen, 487; the only distinguishable feature is, that there the wife of the justice was expressly authorized by her husband to receive the notice, Whether such authority be given or not, is not material. The motion for a mandamus is refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Wend. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ulster-c-p-nysupct-1832.