People v. Ulrich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ulrich

37 A.D.2d 981, 327 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2974

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 22, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 981 (People v. Ulrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ulrich, 37 A.D.2d 981, 327 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County, both rendered January 19, 1971, one as to defendant Ulrich and the other as to defendant Lazarus, and order of the same court, dated May 13, 1969, as to defendant Ulrich, affirmed. In our judgment the allegations in the affidavit in support of the application for a search warrant were sufficient to establish probable cause. The reliability of the informant, the New York City Police Department, is unassailed. The reliability of their information that a certain telephone was being used in furtherance of bookmaking activities was corroborated when a criminal investigator from the Westchester County Sheriff’s Office called the number given in the tip and proceeded to place a bet (Spinelli v. United States, 393 U. S. 410; People v. Cerrato, 24 N Y 2d 1; People v. Marshall, 13 N Y 2d 28). Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County, both rendered January 19, 1971, one as to defendant Ulrich and the other as to defendant Lazarus, and order of the same court, dated May 13, 1969, as to defendant Ulrich, affirmed. In our judgment the allegations in the affidavit in support of the application for a search warrant were sufficient to establish probable cause. The reliability of the informant, the New York City Police Department, is unassailed. The reliability of their information that a certain telephone was being used in furtherance of bookmaking activities was corroborated when a criminal investigator from the Westchester County Sheriff’s Office called the number given in the tip and proceeded to place a bet (Spinelli v. United States, 393 U. S. 410; People v. Cerrato, 24 N Y 2d 1; People v. Marshall, 13 N Y 2d 28). Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 981, 327 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ulrich-nyappdiv-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack