People v. ULLMER
This text of 721 N.W.2d 595 (People v. ULLMER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joe Travis ULLMER, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in my dissenting statement in People v. Conway, 474 Mich. 1140, 716 N.W.2d 554 (2006).
MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in my dissenting statement in People v. Wright, 474 Mich. 1138, 716 N.W.2d 552 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
721 N.W.2d 595, 477 Mich. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ullmer-mich-2006.