People v. ULLMER

721 N.W.2d 595, 477 Mich. 878
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 29, 2006·No. 130941·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

721 N.W.2d 595 (2006)

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joe Travis ULLMER, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 130941. COA No. 267702.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 29, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:

I would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in my dissenting statement in People v. Conway, 474 Mich. 1140, 716 N.W.2d 554 (2006).

MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows:

I would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in my dissenting statement in People v. Wright, 474 Mich. 1138, 716 N.W.2d 552 (2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. ULLMER, 721 N.W.2d 595, 477 Mich. 878 (Mich. 2006).

721 N.W.2d 595 (People v. ULLMER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People of Michigan v. Joshua Jerrold Tietz
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2019
People v. Axley
726 N.W.2d 723 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
People v. Otterbridge
721 N.W.2d 595 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)