People v. Uddin

225 A.D.2d 806, 639 N.Y.2d 949, 639 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3098
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s challenge to the court’s refusal to charge manslaughter in the second degree (see, Penal Law § 125.15) as a lesser-included offense of murder in the second degree (see, Penal Law § 125.25) is foreclosed by reason of the jury’s verdict finding him guilty of murder in the second degree, the crime alleged in the indictment, and its implicit rejection of the lesser-included offense of manslaughter in the first degree (see, People v Boettcher, 69 NY2d 174, 180; People v Broadie, 221 AD2d 352; People v Cruz, 191 AD2d 507; People v Hendricks, 191 AD2d 584).

We find the sentence imposed is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertirio, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Uddin, 225 A.D.2d 806, 639 N.Y.2d 949, 639 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

225 A.D.2d 806 (People v. Uddin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Beriguete
51 A.D.3d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)