People v. Tyson
This text of 165 N.W.2d 304 (People v. Tyson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted in a non-jury trial of armed robbery. CL 1948, § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 28.797).
On appeal the sole issue raised for our consideration was whether there was sufficient evidence presented during the trial upon which the trial court could make a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
An examination of the record discloses sufficient admissible testimony presented at trial for the fad finder to make a determination of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 N.W.2d 304, 14 Mich. App. 264, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tyson-michctapp-1968.