People v. Tyler

275 A.D.2d 947, 715 N.Y.S.2d 185, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9669
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Tyler. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 A.D.2d 796

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erred in sentencing him as a second felony offender without conducting a hearing to determine whether, as a result of the tolling provision set forth in Penal Law § 70.06 (1) (b) (v), defendant’s prior felony conviction was within the 10-year period set forth in Penal Law § 70.06 (1) (b) (iv). That contention is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). We note that our determination is without prejudice to a motion to set aside the sentence as illegal (see, CPL 440.20). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Wisner, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tyler, 275 A.D.2d 947, 715 N.Y.S.2d 185, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

275 A.D.2d 947 (People v. Tyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 70.06
New York PEN § 70.06(1)(b)(v)