People v. Tyler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tyler

186 A.D.2d 1085, 590 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11778

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the Legislature did not couple the aggravating factors contained in Penal Law § 160.10 with a requirement of proof of a culpable mental state (see, People v Mitchell, 77 NY2d 624, 627). Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that his conviction, under the second count of the indictment, of robbery in the third degree, should be reversed. Further, we reject defendant’s contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J. — Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the Legislature did not couple the aggravating factors contained in Penal Law § 160.10 with a requirement of proof of a culpable mental state (see, People v Mitchell, 77 NY2d 624, 627). Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that his conviction, under the second count of the indictment, of robbery in the third degree, should be reversed. Further, we reject defendant’s contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J. — Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

People v. Tyler, 186 A.D.2d 1085, 590 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

186 A.D.2d 1085 (People v. Tyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related