People v. Tuthill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tuthill

50 A.D.2d 583, 374 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12359

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 583 (People v. Tuthill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tuthill, 50 A.D.2d 583, 374 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12359 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence (Indictment Nos. 145/74 and 215/74) of the County Court, Orange County, imposed March 3, 1975, upon his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, as a felony, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being one year in the county jail and revocation of his driver’s license. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the period of incarceration to the time already served; and, as so modified, sentence affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence (Indictment Nos. 145/74 and 215/74) of the County Court, Orange County, imposed March 3, 1975, upon his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, as a felony, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being one year in the county jail and revocation of his driver’s license. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the period of incarceration to the time already served; and, as so modified, sentence affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 583, 374 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tuthill-nyappdiv-1975.