People v. Tuscillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tuscillo

229 A.D. 240, 240 N.Y.S. 588, 1930 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10351

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In light of the testimony of witnesses that defendant had stated that he had authorized his brother to bribe the complaining witness in order to keep the latter away from the trial, the testimony of the complaining witness that a person, who stated that he was a brother of defendant, had paid him $250 to keep away from the trial was properly admissible. (Adams v. People, 9 Hun, 89.)

On reargument, the judgment of conviction of the County Court of Richmond county should be affirmed.

Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.

On reargument, judgment of conviction of the County Court of Richmond county unanimously affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In light of the testimony of witnesses that defendant had stated that he had authorized his brother to bribe the complaining witness in order to keep the latter away from the trial, the testimony of the complaining witness that a person, who stated that he was a brother of defendant, had paid him $250 to keep away from the trial was properly admissible. (Adams v. People, 9 Hun, 89.)

On reargument, the judgment of conviction of the County Court of Richmond county should be affirmed.

Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.

On reargument, judgment of conviction of the County Court of Richmond county unanimously affirmed.

People v. Tuscillo, 229 A.D. 240, 240 N.Y.S. 588, 1930 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

229 A.D. 240 (People v. Tuscillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related