People v. Turner

2025 NY Slip Op 00753
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 2025
Docket76 KA 21-01476
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 00753 (People v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Turner, 2025 NY Slip Op 00753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Turner (2025 NY Slip Op 00753)
People v Turner
2025 NY Slip Op 00753
Decided on February 7, 2025
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 7, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: BANNISTER, J.P., SMITH, OGDEN, NOWAK, AND HANNAH, JJ.

76 KA 21-01476

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

TAVION TURNER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (JESSICA STICKL ASBACH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. KEANE, ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DANIEL J. PUNCH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Chautauqua County Court (David W. Foley, J.), rendered September 22, 2021. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and thus does not foreclose his challenge to the severity of his sentence. We agree. Here, "there is no basis [in the record] upon which to conclude [County Court] ensured 'that the defendant understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty' " (People v Jones, 107 AD3d 1589, 1590 [4th Dept 2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1075 [2013], quoting People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; see People v Barzee, 204 AD3d 1422, 1422 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 38 NY3d 1132 [2022]). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: February 7, 2025

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 00753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-turner-nyappdiv-2025.