People v. Turner

111 A.D.3d 656, 974 N.Y.S.2d 289
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Turner. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 A.D.3d 1392

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), imposed December 14, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). Thus, review of his excessive sentence claim is not precluded. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, EJ., Dillon, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Turner, 111 A.D.3d 656, 974 N.Y.S.2d 289 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

111 A.D.3d 656 (People v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)