People v. Turner

243 A.D.2d 742, 665 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10682
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 27, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens [743]*743County (Kohm, J.), rendered April 6, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the trial court did not err in curtailing his cross-examination of a police officer who testified for the prosecution (see, People v Almeida, 159 AD2d 508, 509).

However, as the People correctly concede, the defendant’s conviction on the charge of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree must be vacated and the count of the indictment charging that crime must be dismissed, as it is a lesser-included offense of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (see, People v Zapata, 235 AD2d 446; People v McCray, 204 AD2d 490; CPL 300.40 [3] [b]).

The sentence imposed on the remaining count was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Turner, 243 A.D.2d 742, 665 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 742 (People v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cato
5 A.D.3d 394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)