People v. Tufino

277 A.D.2d 986, 716 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11537
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 277 A.D.2d 986 (People v. Tufino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Tufino, 277 A.D.2d 986, 716 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11537 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that the plea was not knowing, voluntary or intelligent (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, that contention is without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Ward, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Robertson
286 A.D.2d 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 986, 716 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tufino-nyappdiv-2000.