People v. Tufino
277 A.D.2d 986, 716 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11537
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that the plea was not knowing, voluntary or intelligent (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, that contention is without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Ward, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Tufino, 277 A.D.2d 986, 716 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11537 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).
277 A.D.2d 986 (People v. Tufino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Robertson
286 A.D.2d 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)