People v. Tudor
This text of 755 N.W.2d 630 (People v. Tudor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lester Thomas TUDOR, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 4, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court. At sentencing, the defendant requested a number of corrections to the presentence investigation report, and the court indicated that most of the changes would be made. The copy of the report in the record does not reflect those changes. On remand, the circuit court shall assure that a corrected copy of the report is prepared and transmitted to the Michigan Department of Corrections per MCR 6.425. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that *631 the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
755 N.W.2d 630, 482 Mich. 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tudor-mich-2008.