People v. Tucker (Tyriek)
This text of People v. Tucker (Tyriek) (People v. Tucker (Tyriek)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Tyriek Tucker, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered October 14, 2015, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of unlawful possession of marihuana, and sentencing him to a fine of $75.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered October 14, 2015, affirmed.
We are unpersuaded that the bargained for sentence imposed - payment of a $75 fine - was harsh or excessive. "Ordinarily ... where defendant effects a plea bargain and receives the precise sentence that was promised, he should not later be heard to complain that he received what he bargained for" (People v Fair, 33 AD3d 558, 558 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 945 [2007], quoting People v Chambers, 123 AD2d 270, 270 [1986]). Although defendant claims that he is indigent, he never sought relief from the fine by way of a CPL 420.10(5) motion for resentencing (see People v Toledo, 101 AD3d 571 [2012], lv denied 21 NY3d 947 [2013]) and, indeed, has paid the fine.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: September 12, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Tucker (Tyriek), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tucker-tyriek-nyappterm-2016.