People v. Tucker

298 A.D.2d 415, 751 N.Y.S.2d 387, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9366
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), rendered October 19, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecution called an undercover police officer, who testified that she purchased counterfeit money from the defendant. Any minor testimonial inconsistencies do not render the testimony of the prosecution witness incredible as a matter of law (see People v Morris, 244 AD2d 361). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Crane, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tucker, 298 A.D.2d 415, 751 N.Y.S.2d 387, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

298 A.D.2d 415 (People v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Almonte
23 A.D.3d 392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Lobo
6 A.D.3d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)