People v. Tucker

216 A.D.2d 339, 627 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5980
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Tucker. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 A.D.2d 670

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered May 24, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that the Assistant District Attorney’s summation constituted reversible error. In any event, none of the alleged errors would warrant reversal of the judgment in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v Pilgrim, 208 AD2d 868).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), without merit, or constitute harmless error. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, O’Brien and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tucker, 216 A.D.2d 339, 627 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 339 (People v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pilgrim
208 A.D.2d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)