People v. Tucker

96 A.D.2d 893, 465 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19497
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 15, 1983·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Samenga, J.), rendered January 5, 1982, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The conflicting testimony adduced at trial presented a question of fact as to whether defendant acted merely as an agent for the buyer. Hence, the issue was properly submitted to the jury (People v McLeod, 45 NY2d 95). Similarly, in view of the particular facts herein, the issue of whether the affirmative defense of entrapment was established was a factual issue within the sole province of the jury (People v McGee, 49 NY2d 48, 61). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tucker, 96 A.D.2d 893, 465 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19497 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

96 A.D.2d 893 (People v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodriguez
118 A.D.2d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Zaloga
114 A.D.2d 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Jones
107 A.D.2d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Bristow
106 A.D.2d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)