People v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Colorado

People v. Tucker

42 P.2d 472, 96 Colo. 273, 1934 Colo. LEXIS 246

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedDecember 17, 1934

DocketNo. 13,121.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 42 P.2d 472 (People v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tucker, 42 P.2d 472, 96 Colo. 273, 1934 Colo. LEXIS 246 (Colo. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

MR. Justice Holland did not participate in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Chief Justice Adams and Justices Butler and Burke are of the opinion that it should be affirmed, whereas Justices Campbell, Hilliard and Bouck are of the opinion that it should be reversed. As it therefore must be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MR. Justice Holland did not participate in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Chief Justice Adams and Justices Butler and Burke are of the opinion that it should be affirmed, whereas Justices Campbell, Hilliard and Bouck are of the opinion that it should be reversed. As it therefore must be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 P.2d 472, 96 Colo. 273, 1934 Colo. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tucker-colo-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack