People v. Tuck
224 A.D.2d 913, 638 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1540
Opinion
—Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, judgment unanimously affirmed.
[914]*914Memorandum: We conclude that the conviction of reckless endangerment in the first degree is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495) and that defendant’s sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie Supreme Court, Wolfgang, J.— Reckless Endangerment, 1st Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Tuck, 224 A.D.2d 913, 638 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
224 A.D.2d 913 (People v. Tuck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)