People v. Trumbach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Trumbach

246 A.D.2d 912, 667 N.Y.S.2d 322, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 744

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 246 A.D.2d 912 (People v. Trumbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Trumbach, 246 A.D.2d 912, 667 N.Y.S.2d 322, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered May 14, 1997, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of arson in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of arson in the third degree. The charges stemmed from defendant setting fire to his former girlfriend’s garage. He was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 3 to 6 years. We reject defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive inasmuch as he was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement (see, People v Demers, 239 AD2d 711, lv denied 90 NY2d 904). Moreover, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).

[913]*913Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered May 14, 1997, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of arson in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of arson in the third degree. The charges stemmed from defendant setting fire to his former girlfriend’s garage. He was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 3 to 6 years. We reject defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive inasmuch as he was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement (see, People v Demers, 239 AD2d 711, lv denied 90 NY2d 904). Moreover, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).

[913]*913Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D.2d 912, 667 N.Y.S.2d 322, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-trumbach-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack