People v. Truman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Truman

99 A.D.3d 821, 951 N.Y.2d 686

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 10, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.3d 821 (People v. Truman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Truman, 99 A.D.3d 821, 951 N.Y.2d 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor’s summation deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the challenged remarks were within the bounds of permissible rhetorical comment, fair response to arguments and issues raised by the defense, or fair comment on the evidence (see People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105, 109-110 [1976]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor’s summation deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the challenged remarks were within the bounds of permissible rhetorical comment, fair response to arguments and issues raised by the defense, or fair comment on the evidence (see People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105, 109-110 [1976]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.3d 821, 951 N.Y.2d 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-truman-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack