People v. Truman

225 A.D.2d 473, 639 N.Y.2d 918, 639 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3202

This text of 225 A.D.2d 473 (People v. Truman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Truman, 225 A.D.2d 473, 639 N.Y.2d 918, 639 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

The identification procedures employed here were not unduly suggestive (see, People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 336, cert denied 498 US 833).

Defendant’s "inferential bolstering” claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that any "inferential bolstering” that may have occurred was rendered harmless by the overwhelming evidence of guilt (People v Johnson, 57 NY2d 969). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Johnson
443 N.E.2d 478 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Chipp
552 N.E.2d 608 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 473, 639 N.Y.2d 918, 639 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-truman-nyappdiv-1996.