People v. Troy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Troy

203 A.D.2d 310, 612 N.Y.S.2d 902

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.D.2d 310 (People v. Troy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Troy, 203 A.D.2d 310, 612 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Application by the appellant, inter alia, for a writ of error coram nobis, to vacate a decision and order of this Court, dated June 25, 1990 (People v Troy, 162 AD2d 744), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 20, 1984.

Ordered that the application is denied.

A review of the brief submitted by the defendant’s appellate counsel on his appeal from the 1984 judgment indicates that counsel capably presented several nonfrivolous issues for this Court’s consideration. The defendant’s appellate counsel clearly satisfied the constitutional standard of effective assistance of appellate counsel set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v Barnes (463 US 745). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Lawrence and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Application by the appellant, inter alia, for a writ of error coram nobis, to vacate a decision and order of this Court, dated June 25, 1990 (People v Troy, 162 AD2d 744), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 20, 1984.

Ordered that the application is denied.

A review of the brief submitted by the defendant’s appellate counsel on his appeal from the 1984 judgment indicates that counsel capably presented several nonfrivolous issues for this Court’s consideration. The defendant’s appellate counsel clearly satisfied the constitutional standard of effective assistance of appellate counsel set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v Barnes (463 US 745). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Lawrence and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.D.2d 310, 612 N.Y.S.2d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-troy-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack