People v. Troutman

262 A.D.2d 1011, 691 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7215

This text of 262 A.D.2d 1011 (People v. Troutman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Troutman, 262 A.D.2d 1011, 691 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in denying his suppression motion. The court properly concluded that defendant was not in custody at the house when he made the initial admissions. A reasonable man, innocent of any crime, would not have believed himself to be in custody at the time (see, People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589, mot to amend remittitur denied 26 NY2d 883, cert denied 400 US 851). Further, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Donalty, J. — Assault, 1st Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Yukl
256 N.E.2d 172 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. Cooper
258 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D.2d 1011, 691 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-troutman-nyappdiv-1999.