People v. Trotman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Trotman

26 A.D.2d 793, 275 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3483

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 793 (People v. Trotman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Trotman, 26 A.D.2d 793, 275 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3483 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The original written application of appellant upon which the order appealed from was based is not in the file of the County Clerk and the parties have been unable to produce it. We have considered, however, the allegations of the petition to this court, sworn to by appellant on the 2d day of August, 1966, as stating the basic facts of some of petitioner’s contentions. These same facts were presented on the argument of the appeal. In deciding the issues, we have examined the psychiatric report. (Appeal from order of Onondaga County Court denying, without a hearing, motion for resentence.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The original written application of appellant upon which the order appealed from was based is not in the file of the County Clerk and the parties have been unable to produce it. We have considered, however, the allegations of the petition to this court, sworn to by appellant on the 2d day of August, 1966, as stating the basic facts of some of petitioner’s contentions. These same facts were presented on the argument of the appeal. In deciding the issues, we have examined the psychiatric report. (Appeal from order of Onondaga County Court denying, without a hearing, motion for resentence.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 793, 275 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-trotman-nyappdiv-1966.