People v. Troiano Fuel Oil Co.

65 Misc. 2d 135, 317 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1970 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1341
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided September 9, 1970·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s contention that the county may not adopt ordinances regulating measuring devices on fuel delivery trucks because of article 16 of the Agriculture and Markets Law is untenable. The ordinance is neither inconsistent with nor contrary to the State statute. It prohibits the use of a meter having a device by which any measured liquid can be diverted from the measuring chamber of the meter. Thus it supplements the State statute which is silent as to the type of measuring devices to be employed. In our opinion, .the ordinance is an entirely reasonable regulation and has as its intended purpose [136]*136the prevention of consumer frauds (Grimm v. City of New York, 56 Misc 2d 525; People v. Lewis, 295 N. Y. 42).

The judgment of conviction should be affirmed.

Concur — Hogan, J. P., Glickman and Pittoni, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Troiano Fuel Oil Co., 65 Misc. 2d 135, 317 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1970 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

65 Misc. 2d 135 (People v. Troiano Fuel Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lewis
64 N.E.2d 702 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)
Grimm v. City of New York
56 Misc. 2d 525 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)