People v. Trocchio
This text of 74 A.D.2d 884 (People v. Trocchio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeals from two judgments, one as to each defendant, of the County Court, Nassau County, both rendered October 17, 1978, the first of which convicted defendant Trocchio of attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and conspiracy in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposed sentence [885]*885and the second of which convicted defendant Spatafora of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and conspiracy in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposed sentence. Judgments affirmed and this case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The December 6, 1976 order of then Presiding Justice Gulotta, authorizing the interception and recording of conversations on the telephone of the defendant Trocchio, was constitutional and valid. We have examined defendants’ other contentions and have found them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Gibbons, Rabin and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 A.D.2d 884, 426 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-trocchio-nyappdiv-1980.