People v. Triplett

Illinois Supreme Court

People v. Triplett

210 N.E.2d 522, 33 Ill. 2d 155, 1965 Ill. LEXIS 216

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 28, 1965

DocketNo. 38752

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 210 N.E.2d 522 (People v. Triplett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Triplett, 210 N.E.2d 522, 33 Ill. 2d 155, 1965 Ill. LEXIS 216 (Ill. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Underwood

delivered the opinion of the court:

In 1956 a Winnebago County jury trial resulted in the conviction of Willard LaVerne Triplett on a charge of murdering his brother. Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment. The case is now before us on writ of error to review the original judgment of conviction. A previous writ of error for the same purpose, commenced in 1959, was apparently abandoned in favor of post-conviction proceedings in the trial court.

In 1961, defendant’s petition under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1961, chap. 38, pars. 826 — 832) was dismissed by the circuit court as insufficient to necessitate a hearing, and this court denied a writ of error to review that judgment. (People v. Triplett, Memorandum Order 3307.) As a consequence, all constitutional questions sought to be posed here are barred (People v. Lewis, 2 Ill.2d 328, 330; followed in Merkie v. People, 15 Ill.2d 539; People v. Byrd, 21 Ill.2d 114, 115; People v. Powers, 22 Ill.2d 174, 175; People v. Dampher, 28 Ill.2d 136, 137), and no basis exists warranting initial eview by this court.

We are mindful that an earlier motion by the State to transfer the cause was denied, but further examination of the jurisdictional situation compels the conclusion that this disposition of the motion was improvident. Accordingly, and for the foregoing reasons, the cause is transferred to the Appellate Court for the Second District for a determination of the remaining nonconstitutional questions.

Cause transferred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Underwood

delivered the opinion of the court:

In 1956 a Winnebago County jury trial resulted in the conviction of Willard LaVerne Triplett on a charge of murdering his brother. Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment. The case is now before us on writ of error to review the original judgment of conviction. A previous writ of error for the same purpose, commenced in 1959, was apparently abandoned in favor of post-conviction proceedings in the trial court.

In 1961, defendant’s petition under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1961, chap. 38, pars. 826 — 832) was dismissed by the circuit court as insufficient to necessitate a hearing, and this court denied a writ of error to review that judgment. (People v. Triplett, Memorandum Order 3307.) As a consequence, all constitutional questions sought to be posed here are barred (People v. Lewis, 2 Ill.2d 328, 330; followed in Merkie v. People, 15 Ill.2d 539; People v. Byrd, 21 Ill.2d 114, 115; People v. Powers, 22 Ill.2d 174, 175; People v. Dampher, 28 Ill.2d 136, 137), and no basis exists warranting initial eview by this court.

We are mindful that an earlier motion by the State to transfer the cause was denied, but further examination of the jurisdictional situation compels the conclusion that this disposition of the motion was improvident. Accordingly, and for the foregoing reasons, the cause is transferred to the Appellate Court for the Second District for a determination of the remaining nonconstitutional questions.

Cause transferred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 N.E.2d 522, 33 Ill. 2d 155, 1965 Ill. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-triplett-ill-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack