People v. Trinh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Trinh

254 A.D.2d 440, 678 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11056

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 A.D.2d 440 (People v. Trinh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Trinh, 254 A.D.2d 440, 678 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11056 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered May 23, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and menacing in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the trial court should have charged the jury on the affirmative defense to robbery in the first degree under Penal Law § 160.15 (4) is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Cona, 49 NY2d 26; People v Lewis, 203 AD2d 389) and we decline to review the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered May 23, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and menacing in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the trial court should have charged the jury on the affirmative defense to robbery in the first degree under Penal Law § 160.15 (4) is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Cona, 49 NY2d 26; People v Lewis, 203 AD2d 389) and we decline to review the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D.2d 440, 678 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-trinh-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack