People v. Trimble
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4301 (People v. Trimble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Grella, J.), rendered December 10, 2015, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court did not conduct a sufficient inquiry of a juror who requested a leave of absence in order to attend the funeral of his brother-in-law’s mother is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant admittedly never requested such an inquiry (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hicks, 6 NY3d 737, 739 [2005]; People v Mebane, 70 AD3d 724, 724-725 [2010]; People v Morales, 36 AD3d 631, 632 [2007]). In any event, the contention is without merit (see People v Argendorf, 76 AD3d 1100 [2010]; People v Morales, 36 AD3d at 632).
The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, *1273 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 4301, 150 A.D.3d 1272, 52 N.Y.S.3d 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-trimble-nyappdiv-2017.