People v. Trevor N.

122 A.D.3d 881, 995 N.Y.S.2d 513
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 2014
Docket2012-09138
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 122 A.D.3d 881 (People v. Trevor N.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Trevor N., 122 A.D.3d 881, 995 N.Y.S.2d 513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gubbay, J.), rendered September 21, 2012, adjudicating him a youthful offender upon his plea of guilty to grand larceny in the fourth degree, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the imposition of a DNA databank fee; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

As the defendant argues, and the People correctly concede, the Penal Law does not permit the imposition of a DNA databank fee on a youthful offender (see Penal Law §§ 60.02 [3]; 60.35 [10]; People v Shaquille Me., 115 AD3d 772, 774 [2014]). Accordingly, we vacate the imposition of the DNA databank fee *882 (see People v Shaquille Me., 115 AD3d at 774).

Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Roman and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Kahrone H.
204 A.D.3d 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A.D.3d 881, 995 N.Y.S.2d 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-trevor-n-nyappdiv-2014.