People v. Trent

2025 NY Slip Op 06191
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Trent. Read the opinion of the Court — 220 A.D.3d 889
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 2025·No. FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.·Published

Opinion

People v Trent (2025 NY Slip Op 06191)

People v Trent
2025 NY Slip Op 06191
Decided on November 12, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 12, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
BARRY E. WARHIT
LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Shawn Trent, appellant.


Thomas R. Villecco, New York, NY, for appellant.

Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Michael J. Balch and Antonella Karlin of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Teresa K. Corrigan, J., at plea; Terence P. Murphy, J., at sentence), rendered November 13, 2024, convicting him of assault in the second degree and assault in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the County Court improvidently exercised its discretion in imposing an enhanced sentence is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Perkins, 169 AD3d 936, 937) and, in any event, without merit. Since the defendant was rearrested and failed to appear on a scheduled sentencing date in violation of his plea agreement, the court was no longer bound by the original plea agreement and had the right to impose a greater sentence (see People v Downing, 233 AD3d 965, 966; People v Grant, 122 AD3d 767). Moreover, the court expressly warned the defendant that if he did not meet the conditions of his plea agreement, he would face the imposition of an enhanced sentence (see People v Owens, 99 AD3d 1024, 1025; People v Marte, 85 AD3d 945, 946).

CONNOLLY, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, WARHIT and VENTURA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Trent, 2025 NY Slip Op 06191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

2025 NY Slip Op 06191 (People v. Trent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Grant
122 A.D.3d 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Marte
85 A.D.3d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Owens
99 A.D.3d 1024 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)