People v. Tremere

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tremere

31 A.D.2d 639, 295 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2766

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 639 (People v. Tremere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tremere, 31 A.D.2d 639, 295 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 10, 1967, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to the New York City Penitentiary for an indefinite period. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the conviction of grand larceny in the second degree to petit larceny and by reducing the sentence to the time served. As so modified, judgment affirmed. In our opinion, there was absolutely no proof that the stolen article had a market value of more than $100 (see Penal Law [1909], § 1305; People v. Harold, 22 N Y 2d 443; People v. Irrizari, 5 N Y 2d 142). Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 10, 1967, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to the New York City Penitentiary for an indefinite period. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the conviction of grand larceny in the second degree to petit larceny and by reducing the sentence to the time served. As so modified, judgment affirmed. In our opinion, there was absolutely no proof that the stolen article had a market value of more than $100 (see Penal Law [1909], § 1305; People v. Harold, 22 N Y 2d 443; People v. Irrizari, 5 N Y 2d 142). Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 639, 295 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tremere-nyappdiv-1968.