People v. Treaston M.
This text of People v. Treaston M. (People v. Treaston M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
People v Treaston M.
2026 NY Slip Op 02675
April 29, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Treaston M. (Anonymous), appellant.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Decided on April 29, 2026
2023-05723, (Ind. No. 74233/22)
Hector D. Lasalle, P.J.
Linda Christopher
Carl J. Landicino
James P. McCormack, JJ.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Sankeerth Saradhi of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Jean M. Joyce, and Ann Bordley of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Danny Chun, J.), rendered June 14, 2023, adjudicating him a youthful offender, upon his plea of guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his adjudication as a youthful offender, upon his plea of guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, violated the Second and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution for several reasons. None of the defendant's contentions in this regard are preserved for appellate review (see People v David, 41 NY3d 90, 96; People v Cabrera, 41 NY3d 35, 38-39; People v Davidson, 98 NY2d 738, 739; People v Luperon, 85 NY2d 71, 78), and we decline to reach them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
LASALLE, P.J., CHRISTOPHER, LANDICINO and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Treaston M., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-treaston-m-nyappdiv-2026.