People v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Travis

18 A.D.3d 581, 794 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5065

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.3d 581 (People v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Travis, 18 A.D.3d 581, 794 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered August 5, 2003, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon his admission that he had violated a condition thereof, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of driving while intoxicated.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci, Smith and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered August 5, 2003, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon his admission that he had violated a condition thereof, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of driving while intoxicated.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci, Smith and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.3d 581, 794 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-travis-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack