People v. Trammell
This text of 245 N.E.2d 727 (People v. Trammell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed. However, we do not condone the conduct of the prosecutor at the trial. No opinion.
Concur: Judges Scileppx, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen. Chief Judge Pule and Judge Burke dissent and vote to reverse on the ground that, in view of the conceded and unexplained injuries to defendant at the time of his arraignment, the evidence adduced at the Huntley hearing “ ‘ did not ’ as the court observed in People v. Leonti (18 N Y 2d 384, 389), “ ‘ as a matter of law, come up to the standard which the law requires in quantity and quality to warrant’ the finding” that the confession had been voluntarily given.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 N.E.2d 727, 23 N.Y.2d 848, 297 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-trammell-ny-1969.