People v. Trammell

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Trammell

245 N.E.2d 727, 23 N.Y.2d 848, 297 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1630

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 9, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed. However, we do not condone the conduct of the prosecutor at the trial. No opinion.

Concur: Judges Scileppx, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen. Chief Judge Pule and Judge Burke dissent and vote to reverse on the ground that, in view of the conceded and unexplained injuries to defendant at the time of his arraignment, the evidence adduced at the Huntley hearing “ ‘ did not ’ as the court observed in People v. Leonti (18 N Y 2d 384, 389), “ ‘ as a matter of law, come up to the standard which the law requires in quantity and quality to warrant’ the finding” that the confession had been voluntarily given.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed. However, we do not condone the conduct of the prosecutor at the trial. No opinion.

Concur: Judges Scileppx, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen. Chief Judge Pule and Judge Burke dissent and vote to reverse on the ground that, in view of the conceded and unexplained injuries to defendant at the time of his arraignment, the evidence adduced at the Huntley hearing “ ‘ did not ’ as the court observed in People v. Leonti (18 N Y 2d 384, 389), “ ‘ as a matter of law, come up to the standard which the law requires in quantity and quality to warrant’ the finding” that the confession had been voluntarily given.

People v. Trammell, 245 N.E.2d 727, 23 N.Y.2d 848, 297 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1630 (N.Y. 1969).

Pincite

245 N.E.2d 727 (People v. Trammell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related