People v. Townes

122 A.D.2d 92, 504 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59160
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Townes. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 A.D.2d 1057

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (McMahon, J.), rendered April 24, 1985, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Criminal Term properly refused to admit into evidence the out-of-court statement made by a nonparty witness who was unavailable for trial, having asserted his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. The subject statement constituted hearsay which was not against the declarant’s penal interest, nor did the surrounding circumstances contain any indicia of reliability. As such, the statement was not admissible pursuant to an exception to the hearsay rule (see, People v Shortridge, 65 NY2d 309; People v Maerling, 46 NY2d 289). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. Weinstein, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Townes, 122 A.D.2d 92, 504 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

122 A.D.2d 92 (People v. Townes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Maerling
385 N.E.2d 1245 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)