People v. Tourangeau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Tourangeau

115 A.D.2d 625, 496 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55061

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D.2d 625 (People v. Tourangeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Tourangeau, 115 A.D.2d 625, 496 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), both rendered April 24, 1981, convicting him of (1) criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in [626]*626the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and (2) criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record concerning both judgments and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), both rendered April 24, 1981, convicting him of (1) criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in [626]*626the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and (2) criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record concerning both judgments and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.2d 625, 496 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-tourangeau-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack