People v. Torres

2017 NY Slip Op 4477, 151 A.D.3d 767, 53 N.Y.S.3d 557
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Torres. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 A.D.3d 744
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 7, 2017·No. 2014-11707·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J.), rendered December 8, 2014, convicting him of criminal mischief in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 141 [2014]; People v Vasquez, 101 AD3d 1054, 1055 [2012]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are without merit.

Chambers, J.P., Roman, Miller and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Torres, 2017 NY Slip Op 4477, 151 A.D.3d 767, 53 N.Y.S.3d 557 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 4477 (People v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Vasquez
101 A.D.3d 1054 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)