People v. Torres

140 A.D.3d 534, 32 N.Y.S.3d 495
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Torres. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 A.D.3d 1119
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 2016·No. 1491 2546/14·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard M. Weinberg, J., at plea; Diana M. Boyar, J., at sentencing), rendered August 27, 2014, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant had the practical ability to withdraw his plea before sentencing, and his challenges to the validity of his plea do not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 381-382 [2015]). We decline to review these unpreserved claims in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, notwithstanding any deficiencies in the plea colloquy (see People v Sougou, 26 NY3d 1052 [2015]; People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]).

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Saxe, Richter and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Torres, 140 A.D.3d 534, 32 N.Y.S.3d 495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

140 A.D.3d 534 (People v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The People v. Mactar Sougou /The People v. Rita Thompson
44 N.E.3d 196 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Tyrell
4 N.E.3d 346 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)