People v. Torres

305 A.D.2d 701, 759 N.Y.S.2d 696
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 27, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), rendered February 20, 2001, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[702]*702The defendant contends that the court erred in failing to advise him that he would be subject to an automatic and statutorily mandated three-year period of postrelease supervision following the completion of his determinate sentence. However, this contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Wilson, 296 AD2d 430 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 540 [2002]), as is his contention that his factual allocution was insufficient (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; People v Konstantinides, 295 AD2d 537, 538 [2002]). The defendant’s remaining contentions either are without merit or have been rendered academic in light of our determination. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Torres, 305 A.D.2d 701, 759 N.Y.S.2d 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

305 A.D.2d 701 (People v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Richards
6 A.D.3d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)