People v. Torres

267 A.D.2d 337, 700 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12836
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Torres. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 A.D.2d 642

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), rendered September 11, 1996, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the first degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

[338]*338Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). In addition, we have reviewed the contention raised in the defendant’s pro se brief and find it to be frivolous. S. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Torres, 267 A.D.2d 337, 700 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 337 (People v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)