People v. Torres

228 A.D.2d 241, 644 N.Y.2d 23, 644 N.Y.S.2d 23, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6451
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Torres. Read the opinion of the Court — 194 A.D.2d 815

Opinion

[242]*242The trial court properly closed the courtroom during the testimony of the undercover officer based upon the particularized danger to the officer’s safety resulting from the unusually high number of Bronx County cases pending in the court involving that officer as undercover purchaser. This circumstance made it unusually likely that defendants from the officer’s other cases would be present in or around the courtroom (see, People v Martinez, 82 NY2d 436, 443; People v Brown, 214 AD2d 438, lv denied 86 NY2d 791). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Torres, 228 A.D.2d 241, 644 N.Y.2d 23, 644 N.Y.S.2d 23, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 241 (People v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Martinez
624 N.E.2d 1027 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Brown
214 A.D.2d 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)