People v. Torres
Opinion
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the [655]*655prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).
We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit. Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
140 A.D.2d 654 (People v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.