People v. Toomer
This text of 61 A.D.3d 899 (People v. Toomer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the de[900]*900fendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered March 20, 2007, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the County Court failed to conduct a hearing or to adduce sufficient evidence to determine the amount of restitution imposed. However, this claim is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant failed to request a hearing or otherwise challenge the amount of restitution imposed at sentencing (see Penal Law § 60.27 [2]; People v Horne, 97 NY2d 404, 414 n 3 [2002]; People v Allen, 305 AD2d 421 [2003]). In any event, since the defendant agreed at sentencing to the amount of restitution imposed by the court, the court did not err in imposing restitution without conducting a hearing (see People v Ali, 233 AD2d 517 [1996]; People v Jackson, 201 AD2d 504 [1994]). Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Miller, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 A.D.3d 899, 876 N.Y.S.2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-toomer-nyappdiv-2009.