People v. Toodles

81 A.D.2d 768, 438 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11406
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 12, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 81 A.D.2d 768 (People v. Toodles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Toodles, 81 A.D.2d 768, 438 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11406 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered April 23, 1979, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of dismissing the fourth count of the indictment charging burglary in the second degree, and vacating the sentence rendered pursuant to defendant’s guilty plea on such count, and otherwise affirmed. By a six-count indictment, defendant and two codefendants were charged with, inter alia, two counts of burglary in the second degree. Late in the jury trial, defendant and one codefendant pleaded guilty to all counts in the indictment. The court imposed a minimum period of imprisonment for each count for which defendant pleaded guilty, all to run concurrently. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury found the remaining codefendant, Aaron, guilty of each count in the indictment. Count No. 4 of the indictment accusing these three defendants of burglary in the second degree, omitted the words “with intent to commit a crime therein”, thus failing to allege a material element of the crime. Count No. 5 charging a second count of burglary in the second degree did allege all the necessary elements. Therefore, as the People concede, in accordance with People v Hall (48 NY2d 927), and this court’s decision on the appeal of the codefendant, Aaron, in People v Aaron (79 AD2d 575), the fourth count of the indictment should be dismissed and the sentence of three years to six years rendered on defendant’s guilty plea on such count should be vacated. We find the defendant’s other points on appeal to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Birns, Markewich and Silver-man, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Oshry
131 Misc. 2d 888 (Clarkstown Justice Court, 1986)
People v. Parris
113 Misc. 2d 1066 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 A.D.2d 768, 438 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-toodles-nyappdiv-1981.