People v. Tompkins

383 N.E.2d 561, 45 N.Y.2d 896, 411 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2317
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Tompkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 N.Y.2d 748
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 24, 1978·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur in the Dutchess County case [897]*897granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: "Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Does the New York rule precluding a defendant in police custody from waiving his right to counsel, outside the physical presence of his attorney, once that attorney has entered the criminal proceedings, violate the defendant’s right to dispense with the assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.” [See 45 NY2d 748.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tompkins, 383 N.E.2d 561, 45 N.Y.2d 896, 411 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2317 (N.Y. 1978).

383 N.E.2d 561 (People v. Tompkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Tompkins
380 N.E.2d 311 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)