People v. Tomlin

138 N.E.2d 812, 2 N.Y.2d 758
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 15, 1956·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court may entertain an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division reversing a judgment of conviction and ordering a new trial only if such reversal be on the [759]*759law alone. (See People v. Moskowitz, 289 N. Y. 69; People v. Redmond, 225 N. Y. 206, 208; see, also, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, p. 754.) In the case before us, the order explicitly recites that the reversal was on the facts ”, as well as on the law, and, accordingly, we have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal.

The appeal should be dismissed.

Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Yan Voorhis and Burke, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Tomlin, 138 N.E.2d 812, 2 N.Y.2d 758 (N.Y. 1956).

138 N.E.2d 812 (People v. Tomlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mackell
351 N.E.2d 684 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)